Fall Vacation !



It has been a busy reading  year and it is time to take some  vacation!

I read  57 books and 22 of them in French.

I will be back soon……!!



Posted by on September 13, 2014 in Uncategorized


Dans l´ombre de la lumière




  • This is my first review in French. I hope I have not made too many mistakes!
  • Translation is at the end of the review.


Ecrivan: Claude Pujade-Renaud
Genre: roman à clef
Personnages principals : Elissa, Augustinus, Adeodatus, et la mère d’Augustinus, Monica.
Endroit: Carthage, 410 AD

Edition: 2013

Trivia: Prix du Roman Historique, Les Rendez-vous de l´histoire – Blois


Dans l’ombre de la lumière est un roman à clef qui touche personnellement un ou plusieurs individus, leur prêtant des actions, des propos, des comportements, entourés d’un parfum de l’amour interdit.

Elissa est une femme rejetée par Augustinus. Elle avait compris dès le début qu’ils ne se marieraient jamais. Ce bouquin, Dans l´ombre de la lumière, s’agit du récit de leur amour, la naissance de leur fils, Adeodatus, et de la tristesse infinie.

Dans ce journal intime, on peux capter amplement les pensées d´une femme qui acceptait de rester en coulisses de la vie d’Augustinus. Elisse exposait ses péripéties, ses émotions et ses états d´âmes.

Le style est très intime.

Ce que m´a conquis était que l´écrivan, Pujade- Remaud, ne se nous prive pas des pensées chaleureuses d´une femme façonnée par l´amour, une femme indifférente aux dieux et maîtres.

Elissa reste une ombre aspirante qui entourait Augustinus.

Enfin, ce livre est de bonne qualité. Un régal!



  • In the shadow of the light is a roman a clef that personally affects one or more individuals, lending their actions, remarks, behaviors, surrounded by the scent of forbidden love.
  • Elissa is a woman rejected by Augustinus. It was understood from the beginning that they would never marry.
  • This book, In the shadow of light, is the story of their love, the birth of their son, Adeodatus, and infinite sadness.
  • In this diary, we can fully capture the thoughts of a woman who agreed to stay behind the scenes of the life of Augustinus.
  • Elisse exposed her adventures, her emotions and her moods.
  • The style is very personal.
  • What won me over was that the author, Pujade- Remaud, does not deprive us of the warm thoughts of a woman shaped by love, a woman indifferent to the gods and masters.
  • Ellissa remains a hopeful shadow surrounding Augustinus.
  • Finally, this book is of good quality. A real treat!



Posted by on September 7, 2014 in Uncategorized


La Terre



  • Author:   Emile Zola
  • Genre:   novel
  • Title:      La Terre
  • Published: 1887
  • Table of Contents:  5 parts, 553 pages
  • Book: Published by  Le Livre de Poche
  • Cover: Gil Blas
  • Setting:  Beauce area North of France between Seine – Loire rivers; village of Rognes
  • Themes:   greed, inheritance, individual’s appetite for land
  • Trivia: Le Gil Blas was a Parisian literary periodical. It is named for Alain-René’s novel  Gil Blas. It serialized many  famous novels such as Zola’s Germinal, L’Oeuvre and Lourdes before they appeared in book form.
  • Trivia:  Published  in 1887  Zola yet again causes a scandal  because La Terre  gives the  reader a glimpse into the raw, shocking and brutal life of « les paysans ».
  • Trivia: Zola was critcized by  ‘Le Manifeste des Cinq’ .
  • Five young naturalist writers accused him of  being bogged down in the ‘vulgar’ and motivated  solely by monetary gain.

Structure:  5 parts

  1. Jean Macquart:  29 yrs, returned from The Second Italian War of Independence 1859,
  2. Illegitimate birth of Jules: =  Marriage  Lise – Buteau
  3. Buteau agrees to share the Fouan inheritance =  family conflicts,
  4. Family squabbles, violence, abuseMarriage Jean- Françoise
  5. More abuse, violence and deaths ( murder or accident?)  =   I see no happy ending here!


  • This is a working-class novel describing the hardships and brutality of rural life in the late 19th C.
  • Jean Macquart arrives in the peasant community of Rognes in the area called  Beauce.
  • Jean  finds himself involved in the corrupt affairs of the local Fouan family.
  • Old Man Fouan has decided to divide his land between his three children.
  • But in a community where land is everything, sibling rivalry quickly turns to brutal hatred as Buteau declares himself unsatisfied with his lot.


  • There are there are more than 100 different characters in the book !
  • The action revolves mainly around:

Jean Macquart: 

  • 29 yrs, born in Plassans,  brother of Lise Quenu [Le Ventre de Paris ]  and Gervaise Coupeau  [ L' Assommoir ]
  • He settles in Rognes after leaving the armyBefriends Lise and Françoise Fouan ( cousins of Fanny, Hyacinthe Fouan) and marries Françoise.
  • He has no interest in possessing the land. He just wants to be a farm worker.


  • 14  yrs at the beginning of the book, is honest and hardworking. She is devoted to her sister but feelings change once Lise marries Buteau.
  • She demands her share of the inheritance after her father dies.
  • Unfortunately she is physically abused by Buteau on several occasions.
  • Françoise esapes her situation and marries Jean Macquart.
  • Yet he cannot save her from her violent death.

Buteau Foran:

  • He is married to Lise.
  • Violent and stubborn  he is obsessed with owning the farmland.
  • He is capable of using his ‘killer instincts’  and is responsible for three deaths in order to get what he wants.
  • His wife pales in comparison to her violent husband, but she is an accomplice in two of the murders

The Fouan family:

  • Parents Fouan, eldest son, Hyacinthe (aka Jesus-Christ), daughter Fanny married to Delhomme and the second son Buteau.
  • Fouan’s have worked the lands for years and want to divide the inheritance among the children.
  • This is where the problems and family conflicts begin.
  • Fouan is disgusted with his son-in-law, Buteau.
  • Hyacinthe is a simple fool, perpetually drunk and dabbles in small time theft, poaching and gambling. He has no wish to continue to work the bevloved land of his father.
  • Delhomme and Fanny lead a honest life and are a hardworking couple.
  • Fanny cares for her father but rations and rules everything in his life ( food, drink, tabacco). She is a penny-pinching daughter with insatiable desire for wealth (greedy).
  • She  falls out with her father and they never reconcile their differences..

Strong point:  Zola’s extensive  research

  • Zola lived  on  a farm for a month. He listend to the local stories, observerd  the daily peasent life. He was interested in  the morals of the village, the rituals of births, marriages, deaths  and the accidents.
  • The death of the old Fouan is based on the story of an old farmer who was killed by his family because it cost too much to feed him!
  • Zola did his homework by reading : L’Histoire des paysans  by  Eugène Bonnemère ( 3  huge volumes )  and les Pensées by l’abbé Joseph Roux.
  • These books  gave Zola a basic knowledge of country life.
  • The former  revealed the individual’s appetite for land and the latter the theft of the land by ground rents and taxes.
  • Both topics became themes in the book.

Strong point:   camera like  descriptions

  • The ‘paysage’ (envrionment) is one of the main characters in the book.
  • Zola can describe the land as a panoramic shot or zoom in to the left or right or even give us a close up of the characters to  reveal their thoughts ( exressions).
  • As in many books Zola uses shadows, light and colors to ‘paint’ with  words.
  • Buteau can recognize the variety of grains in the fields by their colors  “le vert jaune du blé, le vert bleu de l’avoine, le vert gris du seigle ” (pg 222)

Weak point:

I could not enjoy ONE of the characters…..NOT ONE!

Sharp contrasts:

  • Characters:  Zola describes humans as machine-like, the faceless farmers  working synchronized in the fields or the rythmn of a blacksmith. (pg 304)
  • La Terre:  Zola describes  ‘La Terre’  as human. Buteau looks at ‘la terre’ as a lover contemplates his mistress “il la desire  [...] sa jeunesse…” ( pg 222-223)
  • Beginning of the book:   Jean is sowing seeds  in the field for growth, regeneration.
  • End of the book:   Jean is leaving Rognes and watches the labourers once again scattering the seeds in the fields, giving the book a ‘full circle’ feeling.

Connecting the dots:

  • The novel is connected to the other novels in the series by the character  Jean Macquart, His  childhood was described in La Fortune des Rougon.
  • La Terre begins and ends with a scene in the fields while a farmers scatters the seed. This  ‘full-cricle’ feeling is also seen in the beginning and end of:
  • Nana. (starts in an empty theater  – ends in an empty bedroom),
  • Le Ventre de Paris ( Florent returns from Devil’s Island – at the end he is deported back to ‘au bagne’).
  • La Faute de l’abbé Mouret ( Serge suffers from and excessive religious fervour – at the end of the book he has  sunk even deeper in this frenzied faith)
  • There  are strong  ties between the  La Terre and  King Lear  (Shakespeare). The father decides to share his wealth among his children.
  • I cannot  spend  time investigating this interesing connection. It would involve much more work, study and another blogpost!
  • It is a ‘nice to know’  element about the book.

Irony:  None!


  • This was NOT a  pleasure to read.  
  • It is a portrait of a struggling and very , dysfunctional  family  community.
  • << C’est le pire livre de Zola que j’aie jamais lu! >> 
  • The  worst Zola book I have ever read!
  • I agree with  ‘Le Manifeste des Cinq’  that Zola goes  ‘over the top’  with vulgarity, rape, abuse, violence and murder.
  • Last thoughts: I had to read it to finish the series but would never recommend the book!
  • Score was almost 1...but he is a classic writer, that is the only thing that kept the book on score 2.
  • Bah!

Score:  2





Posted by on August 31, 2014 in Uncategorized




  • Author: Sir Walter Scott  (1771 – 1832)
  • TtileWhy did Scott name the book Ivanhoe ?
  • The great Lords of Hampden  offered  King Edward III three rich estates to smooth over an argument: Tring, Wing, and Ivanhoe.
  • Scott thought the name “Ivanhoe” had a certain ring to it.   It’s not easy selecting a title!
  • Cover: detail 15th C manuscript showing a tournament, ( see end of my review)  I choose a portrait of a ´good knight´  because it looks so ‘chivalresque‘!
  • Genre:   Novel (historical romance)
  • PublisherPenguin Classics
  • Published:  1820
  • Table of contents: 44 chapters, 401 pages, introduction, chronology of Walter Scott, historical and explanatory notes.
  • Dedication: to Rev Dr. Dryasdust,  Read this keeping in mind that Scott = L. Templeton and perhaps he is using this dedication to express his opnion  if the book is a history or a romance,. I don’t know what to make of this epistle but did notice the name of the reverend….Dry-as-dust !
  • Quotation:`Now fitted the halter, now traversed the cart, and often took leave….but seemed loath to depart. 
  • The motto alludes to the Author returning to the stage repeatedly after having taken leave. (Prior)
  • ThemeSaxons vs Normans,  disguise vs revelation, chivalry, prejudice against the Jew in medieval times
  • Setting: England:  Ashby, Torquilstone, and Templestowe (The book Ivanhoe describes the events in England  during the crusades.)
  • Timeline:  1194
  • Trivia: (personal)  Why do I want to read Ivanhoe? Hélène Grandjean, in Page d’ Amour  finds Ivanhoe boring and lets the book fall to the ground. I want to see if I agree with her!  After reading the book….Hélène Grandjean was probably not a lover of great books as  I am.
  • Trivia: Four of Scott’s novels involved crusades and crusaders.


I was pleased to read a classic plot without  streaming consciousness ( Bolano´s 2666 )  or dreams ( Bronte´s Villette) ! I must admit that there are flashbacks (not on the chart).


  • Wilfred of Ivanhoe is one of the few Saxon families in England that is dominiated by the  Norman conquerors.
  • Ivanhoe has fallen in love with Lady Rowena who is under the protection of his father.
  • Because of  Ivanhoe´s allegiance to the Norman King Richard the Lionheart (fights in 3rd Crusade along side King Richard) he is banished from his father´s court.
  • Ivanhoe returns to England and uses many means of disguise  to conceal his true idenity.
  • (as a pilgrim, in the tournament as El Desdishado, Ivanhoe covers face often wth his hood).
  • Gallantly Ivanhoe takes part in the tournament at Ashby-de-la-Zouche for the hand of Lady Rowena.
  • King Richard returns from captivity and is disguised as  a knight errant (the Black Knight).
  • Sir Walter Scott admits that this historical fact is presented in fictional form. In truth King Richard returned without any attempts to conceal his identity.
  • There are many more action packed incidents in the book:

Character list:   (overview… a quick guide)

  • Fictional characters participate in actual historical events  with historical figures  (Third Crusade, Norman invasion of England, King Richard and Prince John)
  • Hero: Ivanhoe,  melancholy
  • Heroine: Rowena, unworthy of Ivanhoe, and unworthy of her place as heroine, icy, faultless, prim. She never forgave Rebecca her beauty, nor her flirtation with Wilfrid.
  • Heroine: Rebecca, jewess who is admirable, tender, heroic
  • Dishonorable knights: Front-de-Boeuf, De Bois-Guilbert, De Bracy  and Prince John (King Richard´s scheming brother)
  • Patriarchs:  Cederic is Ivanhoe´s father and  Isaac of York is (Jewish moneylender) is Rebecca´s  father
  • Outlaw:   Robin Hood (of Locksley)  —  a lot of the action takes place in Sherwood forest so of course we run into him.
  • Backstory:  Gurth and Wamba are servants who provide information about the political situation in England. I still had to check Wikipedia regularly to understand what was going on.
  • Ex machina: King Richard comes to Ivanhoe´s  rescue  (pg 114) as well as the Saxon nobility in general.


  • The dialogue is filled with thee and thou, hath and hath not and leaveth but it was not irritatiing once you get used to it.
  • Flashbacks were used to give you an idea what  another character was doing during the present action. A sort of ´ meanwhile back at the ranch´ idea. Be prepared.
  • Strong descriptions of main characers. I especially like the one of  “an athletic figure [...]burned almost into Negro blackness by constant exposure to the tropical sun” .(pg 24). We do not know who it is but Scott lets the reader think….could it be a Templar returning from the Holy Land Crusades?
  • Scott  uses the literary techniqe ‘direct address’. For example:   “It is necessary to keep these inconsistancies of John’s character in view, that the reader may understand his conduct during the present evening. ” (pg 126)

Best chapters:  ( just to name a few…)

  • Chapter 8 and 12:  1st and 2nd days of jousting  tournament  Ivanhoe ( Disinherited Knight)  vs Brian de Bois Guilbert ( Templar )   exciting!
  • Chapter 16 and 20:  Friar Tuck meets  the Black Knight ( incognito King Richard the Lionheart) – hilarious!

Best character:  Rebecca

  1. Never adopts any form of disguise
  2. Good judgement of people and situations;
  3. Expresses her love for Ivanhoe as he sleeps because their relationship is doomed from the start ( Christian-Jewess)
  4. ‘The other woman’, if times had allowed she should have married Ivanhoe. The tension between Ivanhoe and Rebecca is palpable. You just have to love her!

Worst character: Lucas de Beaumanoir,

  • He is the he most frightening, and hateful figure in the novel .
  • Lucas de Beaumanoir is the Grand Master, grim interrogator,  the head of the religious soldiers the Knights Templars.
  • He delighted in tormenting Jews,
  • When Isaac approaches Beaumanoird, The Grand Master reacts, “ ‘Back, dog!’ said the Grand Master; ‘I touch not misbelievers, save with the sword. (pg 309)
  • The most historically accurate account of  the Grand Master’s  attempt to have Rebecca burned at the stake and her choice of ‘trial by combat’


  1. One of the great novels about England
  2. Irony:  written  by a Scotsman.
  3. Rebecca: gifted student, teacher with extraordinary talents.
  4. Irony: these wonderful talents will almost cost her her life when seen as magical, the work of a witch.
  5. Rebecca:  tells Ivanhoe she belongs here in England. “I am of England [...] and speak the English tongue, although my dress and lineage belong to another climate”.
  6. Irony: in the last chapter she admits her exclusion as a Jew in England and must leave.  Such is no safe abode for the children of my people.” (pg 399)
  7. Isaac:  is scorned as a moneylending Jew“…those of thy tribe give nothing for nothing…” (pg 65). Isaac lends Ivanhoe  a horse and equipment for the tournament.
  8. Irony:  there is NOT ONE incident of moneylending in the book!
  9. Scott praises the original ideals of the crusaders.
  10. Irony: later Scott criticizes their real behaviour: “… dissolute (corrupt) crusaders, or hypocritical ( professing virtues they do not have) pilgrims… (pg 39)


Strong point:    Characterization of   Rebecca: 

  • This book introduced me to one of the most famous female characters in the Victorian novel, Rebecca
  • She was quiet, subtle yet there was the ever present inner conflict between her jewishness and her love for the christian Ivanhoe.
  • She is the most clearsighted character in the book because she  learned   so much from years of anti-semitism leading her to be very wise and wary.
  • Scott creates  the most  tension in the book  because you know Rebecca and Ivanhoe may never be together, yet you keep wishing and hoping it will happen.

Strong pointScott’s extensive research:

  • Medieval times: He was writing a book about another time and place ( 1194 AD).
  • It includes chivalric code, tournaments, racial attitudes ( Jews), speech patterns, the feeling of occupation (Normans vs Saxons) 150 years after the Battle of Hastings.
  • Language plays an important role in the book. (pg 41) Cederic, Prior Aymer and the Templar (Bois-Guilbert) are not in agreement .
  • Which language shall they use, the one of the victors or the vanquished.
  • Clothes, armor, manners, interiors of great houses as Cederic’s Rotherwood all come to live in  Ivanhoe. It was a pleasure to read.

Strong point:  Scott’s  moral convictions:

  • Scott was an accomplished historian and perfectly aware of the wave of anti-semitism that the preaching of the First Crusade in 1095.
  • I  was surprised to see this side of Scott. I only related him to  all that is chivalrous and not discrimination  of the Jews.
  • Scott introduces Isaac the moneylender in chapter five with words from The Merchant of Venice:Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Christian is?”  Powerful !
  • This is another reason to read the book and become aware of the plight of the Jews in medieval England.

Last thoughts;

  • This was a wonderful book and I am so happy I got around to reading it.
  • Scott’s book was filled  ‘to the brim’  with so many references..( historical, philosphical, mythological, legendery, literary, biblical.  There are also references to many  saints and places.
  • This is proof of Scott’s great knowledge.  I love to look up  latin phrases,  references to Shakespeare, mythology etc.
  • I enjoyed  learning  new words in MY OWN LANGUAGE  instead of French ( see list) for a change.
  • Do not be hesitant to put this on a  “to read Classics List”. The character Rebecca  will linger in your mind, proud,unchanging and inflexible.
  • Scott basically invented the historical romance novel and his influence on fiction of the 19th century is impossible to overestimate.
  • Scott’s  writing style can feel dated, theatrical or at times  even  bombastic, but  it is still surprisingly a great classic read.

Score: 5

(c) National Galleries of Scotland; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation   photo(29)








Words: ( just a few examples…….)

  • cudgel – heavy stick
  • subaltern – in lower rank
  • gramercy – many thanks
  • te beseen – to appreciate
  • raiment – clothing
  • to shew – to show
  • to fain – to  be obliged, required
  • to ween – to think
  • sirrah – contemptuous term for a fellow, mister
  • kirtle – long dress with tapering sleeves
  • chamfrom – armour plate for a horse head
  • farrier – one who shoes horses
  • to contemn – to view with contempt
  • to caracol – to execute a half turn to the right or left on a horse
  • to requite – to avenge













Posted by on August 27, 2014 in Uncategorized


European Reading Challenge 2014

ERC 2014

  1. I’ve been  reading ‘ challenge’  material and did not even realize it!
  2. Thanks to Rose City Reader I will enter my ‘FIRST’ challenge in 2014
  3. I’m a little late joining, but  better late than never.
  4. My book selections  are in 3 different languages, English, Dutch and French.
  5. My goal by joining this challenge will be to venture  out of my  comfort zone  countries and explore more of the world!
  7. Five Star (Deluxe Entourage):   Read at least five books by different European authors or books set in different European countries.

My list  January – August  2014 includes:


Posted by on August 22, 2014 in Uncategorized


Book beginnings: Ivanhoe


I discovered Rose City Reader  via  Tracy’s  Bitter Tea and Mystery blog. I’m not a mystery reader but enjoy Tracy’s reviews and enthusiam for the genre.

The introduction to Rose City Reader caught my attention   ‘compulsive  list reader’  

I’m  working on my second Classic Book List   and have never enjoyed reading so much.

At times I don’t know which book to choose!  I just put all the names into a hat and pull one out.

This will be my first  My book beginnings on Fridays:

Here is the opening sentence from  Ivanhoe  by Sir Walter Scott, published  in 1819.

“In that pleasant district of merry England which is watered by the river Don, there extended in ancient times a large forest, covering the greater part of the beautiful hills and vallies which lie between Sheffield and the pleasant town of Doncaster.

  • Often thought of as a ‘boys’ book, yet it will reveal one of the strongest female characters in 19th C Victorian novels:  Rebecca.
  • Scott has chosen to start his book with a sense of place. I assume  he’s referring to Sherwood Forest because I see Robin of Locksely (Robin Hood) on the character list.
  •  I have a cup of tea and a small piece of 85% pure chocolate ready for moral support. I will have to adjust  my reading to a world of  “thee and thou’s”–  “hath and hath not’s ”  —  “wouldst and leaveth’s “
  • Last thought:  Bit of irony…..classc book about ‘Englishness’ is written by a Scottsman!
  • Now I’m reading Ivanhoe,
  • but progressing is very slow.
  • Tomorrow it will be apparent,
  • what will happen to this knight errant!
  • Yellow hair’d, the blue ey’d Saxon came.
  • In truth no one knew his name.
  • Pligrim, palmer, guide or gentry be?
  • That is what I’ll have to see!

Posted by on August 22, 2014 in Uncategorized


Hans Brinker or The Silver Skates


  • Author: Mary Mapes Dodge ( 1831 – 1905) 
  • Ttile:  Hans Brinker or The Silver Skates
  • Cover: Antique book  ( dd 1901)
  • Genre:   novel
  • PublisherCharles Scribner’s  Sons
  • Published:  1865
  • Table of contents: 48 chapters, 393 pages  and 108 illustrations
  • Dedication: “This book is dedicated to the boys and girls of New Amsterdam ( NYC)  by their friend Mary Mapes Dodge.”
  • Quotation: none
  • Thememoral  obligation  vs  own self-interest;  poor can equal or surpass the rich if given a chance ( skating race)
  • Setting:  village of Brock, The Netherlands
  • Timeline: 1830´s
  • Trivia: (personal)   I received this antique  book as present  just before I emigrated to The Netherlands.
  • Trivia:  ERROR pg 118 Dodge thinks she is writing in Dutch when she says   ´donder and blixin´  (thunder and lightning).  In Dutch is shoud be ´donder and bliksem´!


  • In her desire to be informative Dodge switches her point of view frequently,  This disrupts the structure and flow of the narrative
  • She introduces the main characters (Hans, Gretel and the parents) then suddenly writes ‘travelogue’ chapters  about Holland, its people, landscape, dikes and culture.
  • In the middle section Hans and the Brinker family ‘disappear’  while a teenage boy Peter van Holp and his friends take over the action ( pg 84 – 256)


  • Hans and Gretel Brinker ─  school friends refer to them as “rag pickers” or “peasants.”  (bullying)
  • Mrs Brinker and Raff Brinker ─   father is injured during work on the dikes and is  now an invalid. ( hardships of a poor family apparent when compared to middle class).
  • Peter van Holop ─ middle class boy who promises to send Dr. Boekman to help Hans´s father.
  • Dr. Boekman ─ there is a connection between the doctor´s long lost son and the Raff Brinker`s work accident.


  • The story is simple.
  • The impoverised Brinker family tries to  make ends meet.
  • Hans Brinker enters a  skating race  to win the ´silver skates´ and help his family.
  • Hans´s inner conflict between knowing what ought to be done and actually doing in is the core of the story.
  • This is what young readers should learn from this book.
  1. Should he attack those who humiliate him and his family?
  2. Should he keep the purse he has found or return it to the rightful owner?
  3. Should he spend a gift of money on steel skates or on food for his family?
  • In the end Dr Boekman is impressed with Hans´s choices which show great character.
  • Dr. Boekman accepts Hans as a new young assistant and the Brinker´s family  situation improves dramatically.


  1. The writing style is atrocious. I’ve read other books written around 1865 ( Dickens, Twain, Lewis Carroll) and they all far superior to Mrs. M. Dodge.
  2. Here is an example of a sentence:
  3. ” Giving vent to a good-natured Dutch whistle, the English of which was, that girls were troublesome creatures, he steered towards her.”
  4. This style of writing seems unnatural, choppy,  the verb ‘vent’ is usually used to express ire, anger, pent up emotion.
  5. Brother and sister speak about  their parents  as:  “THE father threw my beautiful shoes in the fire”( pg 3) and  “THE  mother will need us soon.”  (pg 4)
  6. Who speaks like this? No one I know in The Netherlands!
  7. I haven’t read more than 4 pages and I’m afraid this is not going to be one of my favorite children’s books.  But I will give it a chance.
  8. (pg 9)  “..let me ask you to take a rocking-chair trip to that far country…” (ridiculous)


Strong point:  The skating race is used to show how the poor, if given a chance, can be equal or even better than the richer middle class. Mrs. Dodge herself was a widow trying to raise and support 2 young boys. The tone in the book reflects her own situation to improve the family´s financial position through hard work and perserverence. These are the qualities she most admires in the Dutch people.(pg 16)

Weak point: This book is not a language virtuoso performance. I have been spoiled with books written by James Thurber, Lewis Carroll and E.B. White. The narrative tasted like sawdust.

Weak point: The novel (1865)  felt outdated, lacking freshness and musty.  However  i found  The Scarlet Letter (1850) still to be a very  powerful story. The year of publication  has little influence on a book as long as the writing is commendable.

Weak point:  Hans Brinker or the Silver Skates contains TOO MUCH  historical information about Holland and not enough about Hans Brinker!

Weak point: Dodge breaks the golden rule of writing:  write about something you know about!  She has filled the book with historical and cultural information that she has received from two friends, natives of The Netherlands, who now reside in America.

Weak point: Dodge tries to  use  informal dialogue  to give the flavor of the Dutch language. Take it from someone who DOES speak Dutch, the author  fails miserably.   At times it was ´painful´ to read  the awkward speech patterns.

  • Last thoughts:  I so wanted to love this book but it failed to entertain me.
  • It started off with Hans and Gretel and I was waiting for the race.
  • Unfortunately it took hours to read a very  dull ´tourist guide´ through Holland and Haarlem (Peter van Holp and his band of merry boys).
  • The action picks up at the end but this was not enough to salvage the book.
  • I would NOT recommed this book  because there are so many other GOOD  children´s  books to read.
  • Don´t  waste your precious reading time on this one!

Score: 1



Posted by on August 21, 2014 in Uncategorized


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 129 other followers

%d bloggers like this: